2017 (4) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the petitioners can make a request to the respondent to provide an opportunity to cross-examine Mr. J. Thiyagarajan and G. Venkatesh of M/s. Surana Corporation, who are infact petitioners in the earlier writ petition, in the event, the respondent proposes to rely upon the statement recorded by them during the adjudication of SCN - petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P. Nos. 280 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... itions before this court in W.P. Nos. 23984 to 23986/2015 [2016 (340) E.L.T. 308 (Mad.)] challenging an identical order rejecting permission to cross-examine the three persons. In the said writ petitions, the noticees did not file any reply to the show cause notice and this court allowed the writ petitions by a common order dated 27-6-2016 directing the petitioners therein to submit a reply to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al hearing, during which the petitioners can make a request to the respondent to provide an opportunity to cross-examine Mr. J. Thiyagarajan and G. Venkatesh of M/s. Surana Corporation, who are infact petitioners in the earlier writ petition, in the event, the respondent proposes to rely upon the statement recorded by them during the adjudication of show cause notice. 5. The above writ petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X