2015 (11) TMI 1656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that If the Central Government itself is of the opinion that the rebate is to be allowed on both the forms of excise duties the government is bound thereby and the rule in-question has to interpreted in accord with this understanding of the rule maker itself - petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2945 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 27-11-2015 - Govind Mathur .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner held that the rebate as permissible cannot be claimed for second time. The orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), thus, were upheld. 3. Before us, the argument advanced by learned counsel is that Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, on which the impugned action as well as the impugned order is based has already been interpreted by Hon ble Supreme Court of India in M/s. Spentax I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X