2006 (9) TMI 572

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Navin Prakash and B. Krishna Prasad, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER Leave granted. 2. The appeal preferred by appellant herein had been dismissed by the High Court on the ground that although the same was barred by 21 days only, an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 had not been filed. The Division Bench has pointed out that the app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this Court be paid to the National Legal Services Authority. 5. We, therefore, allow this appeal subject to the condition that appellant shall deposit a sum of ₹ 20,000/- before the Member Secretary, National Legal Services Authority within two weeks. 6. We would request the High Court to consider the desirability of disposing of the appeal as expeditiously as possible and preferably .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X