9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 898X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er respondent-authorities had proposed to raise demand for service tax as indicated in the said show cause notices. This Court, by order dated 09.03.2015 dismissed the writ petitions as premature by reserving liberty to the petitioner to file reply to show cause notices - Held that: - issue regarding jurisdiction to impose service tax on the petitioner and Legislative competency having been challe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... passed in W.P.Nos.6599-6600/2015 requires to be reviewed? 3. Review petitioner had filed W.P.Nos.6599- 6600/2015 seeking for quashing of show cause notices dated 20.02.2013 Annexure-A and 22.05.2014 Annexure-B which relates to the period 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 whereunder respondent-authorities had proposed to raise demand for service tax as indicated in the said show cause notices. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal No.28279/2013 and against the order of CESTAT for pre-deposit of ` 350 Crores, petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.12655/2014 and this Court by order dated 08.04.2014 directed the review petitioner to deposit a sum of ` 50 Crores, which has since been complied, matter is now pending before CESTAT. 5. In the meanwhile, for the subsequent period, as noticed hereinabove, show cause no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his stage, no opinion is expressed on merits of the claim and contentions of both parties are kept open to be urged and adjudicated in writ petitions. 7. Hence, I proceed to pass the following: ORDER (1) Review petitions are hereby allowed. (2) Order dated 09.03.2015 passed in W.P.Nos.6599-6600/2015 is hereby reviewed and said order is recalled and writ petitions are restored to file. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
