TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 1064X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 32 of DVAT Act for the second, third and fourth quarters of 2012 respectively - petition allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P.(C) 4352/2017 - - - Dated:- 19-5-2017 - S. MURALIDHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR JJ. Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocate Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Dutta, Advocates O R D E R CM 18987/2017 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, that is precisely what the VATO has done in the present case on 11th and 24th January, 2017. The demand is far more than the refund amount. The above demand order has been passed in 2017, more than five years after the filing of the return. This a plainly an abuse of the process of law. 4. A similar demand created by the Respondent DVAT Department long after the filing of the refund claim wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|