2017 (6) TMI 537

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the respondent - the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) is fare and reasonable by giving the benefit of Section 80 of the Act considering the reason caused due to robbery for non-payment of Service Tax - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - ST/2928/2012 - FINAL ORDER NO. 60852/2017 - Dated:- 3-5-2017 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Sh. G.M. Sharma, AR for the Appellant(s) Sh. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y the respondent and penalties under Section 76 and 78 were also imposed. The said order was challenged by the appellant before the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who gave the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and dropped penalties under Section 76 78 of the Act. Aggrieved from the said order Revenue is before me. 3. The Ld. AR appearing on the behalf of the Revenue submits that as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X