TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 243X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y as he has also shown his bona fide by agreeing to deposit 25% of the amount of duty - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Central Excise Appeal No. 146 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 1-7-2017 - S. V. Gangapurwala And G. S. Kulkarni, JJ. Mr.Ashok Singh for the Appellant Mr.Swapnil Bangur a/w. Ms.Ruju Thakkar for the Respondent ORDER Per Court 1] The Appellant had pr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3] The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the representative of the Appellant could not appear on the given date as the representative could not reach the CESTAT in time. The absence of the representative was not intentional one but due to the reason beyond his control. The learned counsel, on instructions, submits that to show the bona fide of the Appellant, the Appellant is ready to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ellant would not stand to gain by delay. The right of appeal is a statutory right. Considering the reasons given, we deem it appropriate to grant one more opportunity to the Appellant to contest the matter on merits and more particularly as he has also shown his bona fide by agreeing to deposit 25% of the amount of duty. 8] In the result we pass the following order; a) The impugned order dat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|