9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (2) TMI 1242X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 0 days - PMLA - Held that:- The life of provisional attachment order was 180 days, which had come to an end after the order has been passed by the adjudicating authority. Thus, we are not inclined to go into the question of legality and validity of the provisional attachment order and also further to examine the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. However, in the facts of the case, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se from the order dated 17.11.2014 passed in W.P.Nos.24432 and 28235 of 2014. 2. Questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 18.08.2014 passed by the Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement under Section 5 (1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (For short the PMLA Act ), wherein the immovable properties of Dr.V.M.Ganesan, as scheduled in paragraph 6 of the order, w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , came to the conclusion that the provisional order of attachment was legal and valid. With regard to the second question in respect of factual dispute, it was held that the adjudicating authority is competent to consider the same and pass order after dealing with the same property. Thereagainst, the instant appeals have been preferred. 5. During the pendency of the appeals, the Adjudicating Au ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder was 180 days, which had come to an end after the order has been passed by the adjudicating authority. Thus, we are not inclined to go into the question of legality and validity of the provisional attachment order and also further to examine the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. However, in the facts of the case, we keep it open to be considered by the appropriate authority at ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
