9911796707
TMI Blog1992 (8) TMI 289X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh filed a complaint before the police that the appellant had demanded ₹ 200/ - from him as bribe for getting his work done in the Revenue Department. As a consequence a raid was conducted on March 30, 1979 and it is alleged that two currency notes of the value of one hundred each were recovered from the appellant. Thereafter no further action was taken by the police for about six years and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arding the aforesaid subject and your letter Nig. 23/79 Nig. 1016 dated 17-2-1988 I have to say that I am satisfied after going through the case diary and other papers that there is neither sufficient cause to order for prosecution against Shri Ramanand Chaudhary, Circle Inspector, Nasariganj, Dist. Rohtas upon which basis the order of sanction for prosecution be issued against him. Therefore, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant. The Special Judge (Vigilance), South Bihar, Patna took cognizance of the case on November 21, 1990. The appellant invoked the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code praying for the quashing of criminal proceedings against him. The High Court dismissed the application in limine. (4) Mr . R. K. Jain, learned Counsel for the appellant has challenged the cri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... refused to grant the sanction but later on at the asking of the DIG (Vigilance) he changed his view. The prosecution against the appellant is pending for over a period of thirteen years and it would be travesty of justice to permit the prosecution at this stage which would mean that the appellant would suffer the trial/appeal for another decade. In view of the facts and circumstances of this case ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
