9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 1439X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titioner had submitted a reply on 8-4-2013 stating that he is not liable to pay the service tax - the respondent is directed to take up the petitioner’s reply dated 8-4-2013 and pass suitable orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks - petition dismissed - matter on remand. - W.P. No. 15246 of 2013 - - - Dated:- 7-11-2016 - M.S. Ramesh, J. Shri B. Nedunchezhiyan, Counsel, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he demand made in the year 2012 and that the present demand made by the respondent for the period from 1-4-2013 to 31-3-2014 includes a sum of ₹ 5,47,672/- towards the Service Tax. Since the respondent had not collected the Service Tax for the period 2012-13, they are precluded from collecting the same for the subsequent renewal period of 2013-14. On this ground this Writ Petition has been f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /licencees and had passed a Resolution on 27-2-2012 to collect Service Tax from all the licencees. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the Service Tax for the period 2012-13 was not collected and that has been clearly explained by the respondents in the counter affidavit. The Corporation had resolved to collect Service Tax from its licencees pursuant to the resoluti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
