9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 45X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that D.R.P. has sufficient corum and they are of the opinion that the order of remand could not have been passed. However, this issue is for D.R.P. to deal with and not for this Court to adjudicate upon at this juncture in the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. A feeble attempt has been made by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondents : Mrs. Hema Murali Krishnan ORDER Heard Mr. SP. Chidambaram, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. Hema Murali Krishnan, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the entire assessment proceedings, including the response of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... including the response of the second respondent, dated 29.09.2016 the petitioner/assessee would be satisfied if the Dispute Resolution Panel, the first respondent is directed to conclude the proceedings within a stipulated time. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel that Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, in its order, dated 24.02.2012, restored all the issues, which were raised before the Tri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ding Counsel for the respondents submitted that Dispute Resolution Panel (D.R.P.) does not have the Corum, and it has only one member, and two other members are yet to be appointed/nominated. Therefore, the learned Standing Counsel requested for some more time to get instructions in the matter, and the matter was directed to be listed on 18.08.2017 (today). 5. Today, when the matter is taken up ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nsel for the petitioner has submitted that a time frame may be fixed, within which, the D.R.P. will dispose of the matter, as the issue is pending since 2013. 7. In the light of the above, there will be a direction to the first respondent/D.R.P. to finally decide the petitioner's application, in F.No.DRP/Chennai/Sectt./016/2010-11, filed before them, dated 28.09.2010, and pass appropriate o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
