9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 899X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... efore the High Courts. It has been ruled by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex Ltd. Vs. Union of India - 2016 (335) E.L.T. 605 (Del.) that the D.R.I. Officers are not competent to issue the show cause notice for the period prior to 08.04.2011. In similar such cases, various Benches of the Tribunal such as, Delhi, Chennai & Calcutta have set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the original authority for deciding the issue of jurisdiction and thereafter to decide on the merits of the case, upon pronouncement of the judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mangali Impex (Supra). For ease of reference, the relevant portion in the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. HR Electronics Vs. Comm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion 11 was inserted under section 28 of the Customs (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2011 dated 16.9.2011, assigning the functions of proper officers to various DRI officers with retrospective effect. 9. Later on, i.e. for the period subsequent to the amendment, the matter i.e. the DRI officers having the proper jurisdiction to issue the SCN or not had came up before the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex Vs. Union of India [2016 335 ELT 605 Del] = 2016-TIOL-877-HC-DEL-CUS, and the High Court inter alia, held that even the new inserted section 28 (11) does not empower either the officers of DRI or the DGCEI to issue the SCN for the period prior to 8.4.11. Thus, it is seen that the said order of the Hon'ble Delhi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eals filed by the UOI in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court in the case of Mangali Impex Ltd." 13. By following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of BSNL (Supra) as well as by considering totality of facts and circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority to first decide the issue of jurisdiction after the availability of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Mangali Impex and then on merits of the case but by providing an opportunity to the assessee of being heard. Till the final decision, the status quo will be maintained." 3. In line with the above observations of the Tribunal, we set aside the impugned orde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
