9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (10) TMI 411X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Respondent ORDER The appellants imported consignment of "100% cotton woven fabrics stock lot" from Srilanka vide Invoice dated 16.2.2007 and Bill of Entry dated 14.5.2007. The importer vide letter dated 12.7.2007 had stated that in their previous import, the stock lot contained some other items other than that was declared which resulted in paying additional duty. That the present consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assification was arrived at basing upon which the differential duty of Rs. 15,42,842/- was demanded by issuing a show cause notice. The appellant paid the differential duty and took provisional release of the goods. After adjudication, the original authority confirmed the classification raised in the show cause notice as well as the enhancement of value and confiscated the goods and imposed redemp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an reiterated the findings in the impugned order. Since the goods were mis-declared the confiscation under section 111(m) of the Customs Act and the redemption fine and penalty imposed are legal and proper. 5. Heard both sides. 6. The appellant has submitted that it does not wish to contest the confirmation of classification of the goods or the differential duty demand. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
