2017 (10) TMI 449

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al BV Netherlands, M/s. Piet Schreurs, De Kwakel BV, Netherlands and M/s. Marhein Rose & Trading Co., Netherland for cultivation and sale of cut flowers under the licence agreement is liable for service tax in the hands of the appellant under reverse charge mechanism? - Held that: - the issue raised for the first time before this bench by the appellant that IPR in the present case does not cover u .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and sale of cut flowers under the licence agreement is liable for service tax in the hands of the appellant under reverse charge mechanism. 2. Shri J.N. Somaiya, ld. Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that in the present case it is admitted fact that IPR service was provided by the foreign companies in India to the appellant and these IPR service are not registered under any law in Ind .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the issue whether the IPR service in the present case falls under the definition of IPR service as per the Finance Act is indeed question of law which can be raised at any stage. 3. He further submits that the demand is time barred in the light of the following judgments:- i) Uniworth Textiles Ltd. - 2013 (288) ELT 161 ii) CCE Vs. Uniworth textiles ltd. - 2013 (288) ELT 161 iii) Ajay Enter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X