2016 (12) TMI 1660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inal product and the said goods are not falling within the exclusion category provided in the definition of input in Rule 2 (k) of the CCR, 2004 - credit allowed - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - Excise Appeal No.E/757/2012-EX [SM] - FINAL ORDER NO.56336/2016 - Dated:- 21-12-2016 - HON BLE MR. S.K. MOHANTY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Appellant : Mr.H.C. Sainbi, A.R. For t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .) Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I reported in 2008 (224) ELT 604 (Tri. Del.) to extend the cenvat benefit on the disputed goods. 2. Heard both sides and examined the records. 3. I find that the cable tray was used by the respondent within its factory for controlling damage to the electric cables which are used for uninterrupted transmission of power to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X