2013 (4) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. G.L. Rawal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kuljeet Rawal and Mr. Himanshu Singh,Advocates ORDER 18.04.2013 1. The Court finds that despite opportunity granted on 22nd March 2013 to the Respondent in this contempt petition to file a reply or on before 10th April 2013 no reply has been filed by the Respondent till date. 2. Mr. G.L. Rawal, learned Senior .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ated that in case of even one single default by the Respondent the Petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate action under the contempt law, and in such an eventuality the provisional liquidator shall also stand appointed . 5. Mr. Rawal submitted that the order appointing the provisional liquidator should not be passed today and that the Respondent should be given an opportunity of pla .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... led such an application for modification or clarification of the said order. 7. In the circumstances, the Court sees no reason why further indulgence should be granted to the Respondent. Consequently, for necessitating today s adjournment, the Respondent will pay to the Petitioner a sum of ₹ 25,000 as costs by the next date. The Managing Director of the Respondent is directed to remain p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X