2003 (4) TMI 28

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iety being asked to vacate the premises which would cause irreparable loss as the office of the society is situated in the said premises/shop – Held that writ petition was not maintainable to set aside sale of a premises which was occupied after order of attachment - Under rule 11(6) to the Second Schedule of the Income-tax Act, the remedy is by way of a suit - - - - - Dated:- 30-4-2003 - Judge .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n (Lodging) No. 734 of 2002. The High Court directed the shop to be sold. Pursuant to the direction, the auction sale was held. It is important to note that the attachment was levied on February 3, 1995. On March 25, 1999, the shop came to be occupied by the society, i.e., after the attachment under the Income-tax Act. In the circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere in the above petition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X