TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 644X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erintendent (AR), for respondent Per: Anil Choudhary Heard the parties on the miscellaneous application for restoration of appeal which has been disposed of ex parte vide final order dated 30.5.2017, order No. A/87923/17/EB. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant explains that the tax matters have been looked after by the partner of the appellant firm, viz. Shri Abhay V. Vaidya and the comm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iving partners in time to take effective steps. It is further stated that the final order passed by this Tribunal was not served at the address given in the appeal memo, i.e. of Shri A.V. Vaidya. The other partners of the appellant firm came to know about the ex parte order only when the officers of the respondent Commissioner approached Mrs. Vaidya for recovery and brought to her know ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was transferred to Division Bench. Thereafter it appears that before the Division Bench, there was some adjournment request and the matter was adjourned to 15.12.2016. Thereafter on 15.12.2016, there was no Bench and then the matter was adjourned to 16.3.2017. On 16.3.2017, again the matter was not taken up and adjourned to 13.4.2017 and thereafter on 30.5.2017, the appeal was he ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|