TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 361X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent ORDER Per: Bench The above appeal arises against rejection of refund claim in terms of Notification No.102/2007-Cus. as amended. 2.1 On behalf of the appellant, Ld. counsel, Shri S. Krishnandh submits that refund has been rejected on two grounds. The first ground is that there was no endorsement on the sale invoices to the extent that no credit has been availed in respect of the imp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant and has rejected the refund. 3. On the other hand, Ld. A.R reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He also submitted that the Chartered Accountant certificate submitted by the appellant requires verification whether it is in compliance with the notification. 4. Heard both sides. The issue whether non-endorsement to the effect that no credit was availed in respect of imported ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|