9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (10) TMI 507X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvs. ORDER 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The respondent was allotted an industrial plot. He had to pay 25% of the price in the beginning and the balance in 6 equal installments. He only paid the first installment but not the rest. A show cause notice was given to him on 5.9.94 under Section 17(3) of the Huda Act. A notice proposing imposition of penalty was also issued ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the said plea assuming for the sake of argument that such a course was permissible in a writ petition the High Court allowed the writ petition "keeping in view the financial stringency of the petitioner, interest of the parties, readiness and willingness of the petitioner to pay the remaining unpaid amount and to set the controversy at rest. The High Court further directed that interest sha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uthority. No finding is recorded by the High Court in this case that the procedure adopted by the Estate Officer was either not in accordance with the statutory provisions or was in violation of the principles of natural justice. The High Court obviously acted as an appellate authority and that too as a benevolent appellate authority. There is no room for any benevolence under Article 226 of the C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
