9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 377X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the respondent. The petitioners have admitted about the receipt of legal notice and no response to it was given by them. The findings of the courts below based upon fair appreciation of evidence deserve no intervention and are confirmed - petition disposed off. - CRL.REV.P. 841/2017 & Crl.M.B.1988/2017, CRL.REV.P. 842/2017 & Crl.M.B.1989/2017, CRL.REV.P. 846/2017 & Crl.M.B.1955/2017 - - - Dated:- 5-4-2018 - MR. S.P. GARG J. Petitioner Through: Mr. Roshan Santhalia with Mr. Ankit Miglani, Advocates. Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Abbot with Mr. Ankit Agarwal, Advocates. S.P GARG, J. 1. Revision petitions No.841/2017 and 846/2017 have been preferred by the petitioner-Shiv Shakti Metal Works through its proprietor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ques in question were issued as security and the respondent failed to return them despite demand. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent urged that no sound reasons exist to interfere in the concurrent findings of the courts below. 7. It is not in dispute that the cheques in question were issued by the petitioners in favour of the respondent. These cheques were of various dates and amounts. Nothing has come on record to show if these cheques were issued by the petitioners in favour of the respondent as security . It has come on record that there were business transactions between the petitioners and the respondent for the last about more than four years. It is further admitted that the respondent used to deliver goods to the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ths. 11. In revision petition No. 842/2017 the substantive sentence is simple imprisonment for six months and the compensation amount is ₹ 20,00,000/-; default sentence is simple imprisonment for six months. 12. In revision petition No.846/2017 the petitioner has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months with compensation to the tune of ₹ 2,00,000/-; default sentence being simple imprisonment for six months. 13. On perusal of the sentence order it reveals that while awarding the sentence the courts below did not apply judicial mind. The business transactions were between the same parties; impugned orders under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act were passed on the same day by the trial court as wel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
