9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (8) TMI 35X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "E", Delhi (in short "the Tribunal"), has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court: "(1) Whether there was material on record to justify, the conclusion that there was no agreement between the petitioner and Smt. Promila Nawlakha to jointly purchase the jackpot ticket before the race on January 7, 1973? (2) Whether there was any mater ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r in question, he had excluded a sum of Rs.42,996 as jackpot winnings from Royal Calcutta Turf Club claiming that he had won the jackpot jointly with his sister-in-law, Smt. Promila Nawlakha. Both the assessee and his sister-in-law filed affidavits stating that the jackpot ticket was purchased jointly by them and thereafter on winning the jackpot, the amount was equally shared by them. The Income- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... court directed a reference on being moved under section 256(2) of the Act. We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue. There is no appearance on behalf of the assessee. Learned counsel for the Revenue submitted that the conclusions of the Tribunal are essentially factual giving rise to no question of law. It is pointed out that what appears to have weighed with this court while directing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
