9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (2) TMI 647X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled by the Revenue is against the order dated 01.08.2011 of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-XX, Kolkata for the assessment year 2005-06 on the following grounds :- (1) Ld. CIT(A.) has erred on law and fact by not accepting the plan and clear meaning of the amendment made in section 40(a)(ia) by the Finance Act, 2010 which clearly states that the amendment has the retrospective effect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - as commission payment in view of the provision of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In appeal, ld. CIT(Appeals) deleted the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer by relying on the ratio laid down by the ITAT, A Bench, Kolkata in ITA No. 267/Kol./2009 for the assessment year 2005-06 in the case of Virgin Creations, Kolkata vide order dated 15.12.2010. 3. We have heard both the sides and per ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of R.B. Jodha Mal Kuthiala reported in 82 ITR 570, wherein the Hon ble Supreme Court held that the provision, which has inserted the remedy to make the provision workable, requires to be treated with retrospective operation so that reasonable deduction can be given to the section as well . Both parties agreed to it. 3.1 By respectfully following t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
