2006 (3) TMI 111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... th respondent is in default to the Income-tax Department. This writ petition is filed challenging exhibit P-7 communication, issued by the first respondent, stating that the transfer of the property, covered by exhibit P-1, made by the fourth respondent, in favour of the petitioner, is invalid. This is an order on a claim petition filed by the writ petitioner under rule 11 of Schedule II to the In .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eed. So, he contends, exhibit P-7 is invalid. The fourth respondent has filed a counter-affidavit in the writ petition. According to him, the notice regarding default has been served on him only in 1997. But the agreement was executed in 1993. The dispute raised in this writ petition can be more conveniently adjudicated in a suit under rule 11(6) of the abovesaid Schedule to the Act. The dispute .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X