9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (6) TMI 1356X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t, 2010 with retrospective effect of 01.06.2007 onwards - Held that:- Tribunal in the case of M/s.Jindal Vegetables Products Ltd. v. C.C.E. Meerut-II [2013 (3) TMI 56 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI], where it was held that when during the period of dispute there was doubt about interpretation of some provision of law on account of conflicting judgements which were later on resolved by a larger Bench, the ext ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ble Property Service amounting to ₹ 29,19,194/- for the period from 2007-08 to 2013-14 by invoking proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. The proceedings culminated into passing of impugned order wherein ld.Commissioner(Appeals) has held that demand of Renting of Immovable Property Service for the period 2007-08 to June 2010 is not sustainable for the reason that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er-in-appeal did not appear to be legal and proper. 4. Heard the ld.AR, who has presented the grounds of appeal. 5. The respondent is absent on call. 6. Having considered the said grounds of appeal and on perusal of impugned order-in-appeal we find that ld.Commissioner(Appeals) has relied upon the Final Order of this Tribunal in the case of M/s.Jindal Vegetables Products Ltd. v. C.C.E. Me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
