2006 (7) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing the Assessing Officer to exclude the sum of Rs. 4,81,957 being assets of Mahendra Dhanjibhai Parmar Family Trust, wherein the assessee was the beneficiary from the net wealth of the assessee?" Mrs. Bhatt, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the assessee is an individual and is partner to the extent of 8 per cent. profits in M/s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ive the amount in question under an obligation of the assessee even before the assessee could lay a claim to receive it as his income, there would be a diversion of income by overriding title; but when after receipt of the income by the assessee, the same is passed on to a third person in discharge of the obligation of the assessee, it will be a case of application by the assessee and not of diver .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st and as the assessee would have no power of disposition, transfer/alienation in any manner, the property cannot be included in the wealth of the assessee. Though Mrs. Bhatt resisted the suggestion of the court for some time, however she herself brought to the notice of the court yet another judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of CWT v. Lov S. Kinariwala (yet another partner of the partne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X