9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (11) TMI 813X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... O R D E R PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, A.M. This appeal preferred by the assessee, is directed against the impugned order dated 15th February 2010, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-I Mumbai, for assessment year 2006-07. 2. The assessee, in this case, has declared income under the heads Income From House Property , Income From Other Sources and Income From Long Term Capital Gai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , order dated 14th July 2008, as well as the decision of Mumbai C Bench in assessee s own case in ITA no.6561/Mum./2005, for assessment year 2002-03, order adted 8th April 2008. 4. The learned Departmental Representative, Mr. Shantam Bose, Sr. Departmental Representative, on behalf of the Revenue, opposed the contentions of the learned Counsel for the assessee by submitting that the Hon'b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d be disallowed against exempt income, we set aside the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and restore the issue back to the file of Assessing Officer for denovo adjudication in accordance with law. 6. In the result, assessee s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on the date of hearing i.e., 29th November 2011 - - TaxTMI - TMIT ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
