9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 1256X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- The petitioner on receipt of the notices (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively) had filed the writ petition in this Court challenging the same to be without jurisdiction. The petitioner had neither filed any objection/reply to the said notices nor raised the pleas as have been raised in the instant writ petition before the competent authority. There are no justifiable reason to interfere with ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nitiated vide notices (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively) for the assessment years in question. 2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the present writ petition as narrated therein may be noticed. The petitioner is a real estate developer engaged in the business of construction of flats and villas. It had received notices (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively) for the assessment years 20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntained in Section 16 of the Act had been extended from three years to six years from the end of the year. The said amendment came into force from 3.8.2015 and, therefore, was prospective in nature. Hence, the present writ petition. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The writ-petitioner have challenged the notices (Annexure P-1 and P-2, respectively) issued by respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled and comprehensive objection/reply and to raise all the pleas as have been raised in the writ petition. In case any objection/reply is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order, respondent No.2 shall decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the objection/reply in accordance with law after aff ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
