9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (11) TMI 20X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment of the court was delivered by MRS. A. SUBBULAKSHMY J.--- At the instance of the Revenue, the following questions have been referred to us : "1. Whether, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the subsidy received by the assessee from the Government should not be reduced from the cost of the assets for the purpose of grant of depreciation and relief under section 80J ? 2. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t perquisite, for disallowance under section 40A(5) of the Act ?" The assessee is a public limited company carrying on business in the manufacture and sale of automobile tyres and tubes. The assessee claims weighted deduction in respect of nine items of expenditure. The assessment officer negatived the claim of the assessee. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax allowed weighted deduction. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the capital for the grant of relief under section 80J and this question has been answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. Following the decision of the Supreme Court, we answer the question in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. With regard to question No, 4, the Supreme Court, in the case of CIT v. Mafatlal Gangabhai and Co. (P.) Ltd. [1996] 219 ITR 644 has held t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
