2013 (4) TMI 906

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... NANJANGUD D/O PRASAD N.S., MRS SHARADA PRASAD W/O PRASAD N.S., 10. MRS CHITRA D/O KRISHNA MURTHY, MR SETHURAMAN GANESAN S/O SETHURAMAN, MRS SHRUTHI BHARGAVA W/O RAVI RAMAN BHARGAVA Versus UNION OF INDIA REP. BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY NEW DELHI ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONERATE OF SERVICE TAX BANGALORE, COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS-UNIT II) , BANGALORE - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e between 2 months 3 days to 4 months 22 days, without specifying as to which of the appeals suffering from the number of days delay. In short, there is non-application of mind. Ex facie the order suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record, calling for interference. 3. In the circumstances, the order impugned dismissing the appeals filed by the petitioners on the ground of delay i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X