2018 (10) TMI 841

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llants. However, in para 10.10, the name of the appellant could not be mentioned and the penalty imposed on him also not mentioned - at page 18 of the order in the 9th line of paragraph 10.10, instead of the expression “therefore reduced to Rs. One lakh each”, it should be read as “therefore reduced to Rs. One lakh each and penalty on Shri Anand Kulkarni is reduced to Rs. Two lakhs.” - ROM applica .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t was not mentioned. He submits that personal penalty imposed against each of the appellants, viz. Ms. Farahjaan Sheikh, Shri Shamsher Mehmood Khan and Shri Jayesh Vyas have been reduced to ₹ 1,00,000/- each and the penalty on the company M/s. Sohil Maklai Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. T.T. Forex reduced to ₹ 2,00,000/- each. It is his contention that the penalty against the present .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt should be ₹ 2,00,000/-. 4. We find that on the first page of the order, this Tribunal has mentioned the names of all the appellants including the present appellant Shri Anand Kulkarni and allowed the appeals partly in relation to all the appellants by reduction in penalty imposed and confirmed against each of the appellants. However, in para 10.10, the name of the appellant could not b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X