2018 (10) TMI 952

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s): Shri V. Gupta, AR ORDER Per: Mr. Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order and claiming the refund of Rs. 31,77,267/- which has been rejected by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacture of Pesticides and Insecticides in the packing of less than 10gms/10ml. The appellant's unit is located in the state of Jammu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... claim was rejected by the authorities below, therefore, the appellant is before us. 3. Today when the matter was called. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant made a statement that the appellant is seeking limited relief from this Tribunal for sanctioning the refund claim of Rs. 29,39,465/- along with interest thereon. Rest of the claim made by the appellant in the appeal, appellant is ready to forg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X