1923 (3) TMI 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n application was made to have that order set aside and that application was treated as an application for review of judgment. The learned. Judge rejected the application for review and from his order rejecting the application for review of judgment this appeal under the Letters Patent has been preferred. In Order XLVII, Rule 7, of the C.P.C. it is provided that no appeal lies from an order reject .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , 1923). In all these cases it was held that an appeal would not lie under the Letters Patent. The principle applied by this Court in these cases equally applies to the present case. Our attention was drawn to the case of Sadiq Ali v. Anwar Ali 70 Ind. Cas. 805 : 20 A.L.J. 801 : A.I.R. (1923) 44. That case is distinguishable from the present and we do not consider that in that case any rule of law .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X