Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2014 (8) TMI 1163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... use and that he will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during the course of trial. - C.R.M. No. M-19791 of 2014 - - - Dated:- 8-8-2014 - M.M. Singh Bedi, J. For Appellant: Tanveer Ahmed Mir, Bhuvan Gugnani, Puneet Mittal and Munish Behl, Advocates For Respondents: Gurvinder S. Sandhu, AAG JUDGMENT M.M. Singh Bedi, J. 1. The petitioner seeks concession of pre-arrest bail in a complaint which has been filed by respondent No. 2 under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short the Act ) which is an off shoot of FIR No. 341 of 2010 registered on 27.11.2010 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) IPC alleging that the petitioner had misappropriated the money of account holders .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uitted of the alleged offence under Section 467, 468, 471, 201 and 477-A IPC. 4. The counsel for the complainant has further argued that the petitioner is not entitled to pre-arrest bail on account of the fact that the complaint by the Enforcement Directorate is not an offshoot of the said FIR but it is the result of independent investigation conducted by Enforcement Directorate and that the Enforcement Directorate is still investigating the matter and the process of detecting the other properties is still in progress. 5. Counsel for the complainant has placed reliance on the judgments in Vikas Kumar Sinha v. The State of Jharkhand through Directorate of Enforcement: 2011 (2) J.C.R. 395 (Jhr.), Anos Ekka v. The State of Jharkhand, B.A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appearance before the said Court and has been granted the concession of interim bail. In view of said circumstances, the interim order dated 2.7.2014 is hereby confirmed. The petitioner will remain on bail against the bail bond/surety bond already furnished by him subject to the condition that he will not tamper with the evidence in any manner and will not cause obstruction in the proceedings of the complaint case and will not absent himself without any sufficient cause and that he will not commit the similar offence of which he is accused of during the course of trial. The petitioner will not leave India without permission of the trial Court. In case of violation of any of the above said conditions, the bail will be liable to be cancell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates