2019 (1) TMI 626

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ver has been indicated by the DRI and furthermore, that the DRI has also expressed no objection for the release of the goods upon payment of the differential duty, if any, the imported goods should be released to the present petitioners who are undoubtedly the actual beneficiaries of the import. This is an unfortunate case where the respondents/Customs authorities intentionally appeared to have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel accept notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 respectively. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the terms of detention of the goods i.e. imports consignment imported through Bills of Entry dated 11-10-2017; the importation by M/s. Manoj Enterprises. The goods were detained by panchnama dated 17-10-2017 and 30-7-2017 and were handed over to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be released. This Court is of the opinion that since the goods have been in detention for more than a year and no irregularity of any kind whatsoever has been indicated by the DRI and furthermore, that the DRI has also expressed no objection for the release of the goods upon payment of the differential duty, if any, the imported goods should be released to the present petitioners who are undoubte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X