2019 (2) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... OURT - TMI - Quantum of pre-deposit - petitioner has filed this Review Petition contending that the condition in Ext.P9 order of the appellate authority is more onerous than what has been statutorily mandated under the proviso to Section 55(4) of the KVAT Act - Held that:- The petitioner is liable to pay 20% of the disputed tax - the petitioner must pay ₹ 2,93,81,208/-(20%) in six instalmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... udgment dated 06.09.2018 in W.P.(C)No. 29440/2018. 3. Now the petitioner has filed this Review Petition contending that the condition in Ext.P9 order of the appellate authority is more onerous than what has been statutorily mandated under the proviso to Section 55(4) of the KVAT Act. According to him, 20% must be of the disputed tax, rather than the existing demand , which includes interest as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X