TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 447X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... C/795/2007 - M/30050/2019 - Dated:- 15-1-2019 - Mr. M.V. RAVINDRAN, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) And Mr. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Ms. Swetha, Consultant for the appellant Shri C. Mallikharjun Reddy, Superintendent/AR for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Mr. M.V. Ravindran 1. This application is filed by the appellant assessee for rectifying few errors noted in Final Order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntention that the quantity received should be considered for computation of duty and not the quantity shown in Bill of Lading. 2c. The last line of the same para No. 2 will read as under: The appellant after having effected payment towards NCCD has however subsequently filed a refund claim of ₹ 12,27,52,950/- on their contention that NCCD will not be applicable in their case. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|