9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1717X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DNUT VERSUS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [2016 (4) TMI 1346 - TELANGANA & ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT], had granted stay on condition that the petitioner deposited 25% of the disputed tax; and in as much as, in the present case, the petitioner has already deposited 50% of the disputed tax, we set aside the order passed by the revisinal authority, and direct the respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rejecting the petitioner s application for grant of stay pending disposal of the appeal by the A.P. VAT Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner herein was assessed to tax, for the tax period January, 2014 to January, 2016 under the A.P. VAT Act, on transfer of the right to use Set Top Boxes . Aggrieved by the assessment order, the petitioner carried the matter in appeal to the Appellate Deputy Commiss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n as much as the petitioner has already deposited 50% of the disputed tax as a precondition for their appeal to be entertained by the A.P. VAT Tribunal, the Additional Commissioner erred in rejecting their application for grant of stay of the balance 50% of the disputed tax. While fairly stating that, in similar Writ Petitions, interim stay was gratned on condition that 25%, of the disputed tax is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
