2019 (3) TMI 778

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d on behalf of the applicant. Even today when the ROA was called, there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant - the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution - application rejected. - E/ROA/50086/2019 and Appeal No. E/3841/2010-DB - MO/50176/2019-EX[DB] - Dated:- 21-2-2019 - Mr. V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) And Ms. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) None - for the appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... called today, none appeared on behalf of the applicant. 4. Heard the ld. DR on behalf of the Revenue. He submitted that there is no provision for restoration of an ROM application which stands dismissed. He also relied on the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 9142-9144 of 2010 in the case of Ram Shiroman Tripathi Ors. Vs. State of U.P. Ors. In the said j .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X