2019 (4) TMI 7

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent ORDER Per : Dr. D.M. Misra 1. Heard both sides. 2. This is an application filed by the Revenue seeking rectification of typographical error in the order dated 31/07/2018. 3. It is the contention of Ld. Spl. Counsel for the Revenue that the total amount involved in respect five show-cause notices, subject matter of the Appeal before this Tribunal is R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the mistake. Besides, there is no necessity nor any justification in making correction of the amount shown at para one of the order as the matter has been remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication of the demands raised against the show cause notices issued by the Department to the respondent. 5. Learned Senior Counsel for the Revenue submits that the respondent may take a p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anded in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, we do not find any merit in the objection of the learned Counsel for the Revenue, that unless the typographical rectification of the amount shown in the Order is carried out, the order may be misunderstood by the adjudicating authority. Further such apprehension has been allayed by the Ld. advocate for the respondent mentioning that they .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X