2018 (8) TMI 1789

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the petition? Held that:- The very Bombay High Court judgment referred to itself states that a professional lawyer may represent the petitioner, and not merely an employee of the company, provided he does not take more than a day to submit his arguments - We have also been informed that at present the Bombay view is opposite of the Delhi and Punjab and Haryana views. In the interest of jus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t(s) Mr. Sanjay Kapur, Ms. Megha Karnwal, Ms. Sheena Taqui, Ms. Mansi Kapiur, ORDER Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has argued before us that since the very issue as to whether lawyers can represent their clients in the fact scenario in the present case is sub judice in the Supreme Court, some intermediate course of conduct should have been followed instead of dismissing t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... st beyond one day. We are informed that the matter is fixed for hearing on 31.08.2018. On this date, the In-House Committee will allow the said lawyer to present their case, which will not spill over beyond that date. The special leave petition is accordingly disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. - - TaxT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X