2019 (5) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s were disposed of. By filing this application, we are of the view that appellant seeks to reargue the entire matter on merits, which is not the purport or mandate of the provisions of Sec.35C of Central Excise Act, 1944, made applicable to the Finance Act, 1994. There is no merit on the application - ROM application dismissed. - Application No. ST/ROM/30138/2019 In Appeal No. ST/1777/2011 - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which is an error apparent on the face of the records. We are not in agreement with the submissions as we find, that the bench in Para 8, 9 10 has categorically came to a conclusion that the activity undertaken by the appellant may not be covered under works contract service, accordingly, arrived at a conclusion and appeals were disposed of. By filing this application, we are of the view that a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X