TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 1534X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Sri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5. The petitioner is having a licence to run a country made liquor shop No. 1 in Bankata, District Kushi Nagar. The aforesaid licence was cancelled by the licencing authority vide order dated 31.05.2017. The appellate authority held that the aforesaid order can ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e submits that in view of the facts and circumstances, it is better that the matter be sent back to the licensing authority for passing a fresh order instead of keeping the petition pending here in the High Court. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as the impugned order is only reiteration of the earlier order dated 31.05.2017 and directs for maintaining the same, desp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|