9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (8) TMI 557X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he order of the learned single Judge of the Allahabad High Court made in Civil Revision No. 541/96 on April 24, 1996. The admitted position is that the order of removal of the petitioner from service was set aside by the U.P. Public Services Tribunal, Lucknow. The Tribunal directed as under : The petition is partly allowed. The O.P. No. 1 and 2 are directed to consider the confirmation ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gality thereof only in respect of the direction to pay the interest at 12%. In the revision, the High Court in the impugned order held that the executing Court had no power to enlarge the decree. The decree of the Tribunal does not grant payment of interest and, Wherefore, the order directing payment of interest was without jurisdiction. Thus this special leave petition. It is contended ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t travel beyond the order or decree under execution, It gets jurisdiction only to execute the order in accordance with the procedure laid down under Order 21, CPC. In view of the fact that it is a money claim, what was to be computed is the arrears of the salary, gratuity and pension after computation of his promotional benefits in accordance with the service law. That having been done and the cou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g aside the order directing payment of interest. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Whatever be the difference of amount due and payable to the petitioner, it is but the duty of the respondents to pay the same as expeditiously as possible but not later than three months from the date of the receipt of this order. The petitioner is directed to communicate this order to t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
