9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 154X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T. LTD. VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 76 (1) , NEW DELHI ORS. [ 2019 (1) TMI 1365 - DELHI HIGH COURT] it says that some reasonable time could be considered by this Court for depositing 20% and appropriate directions are issued for disposing of the appeals. There shall be stay of recovery of tax determined for the assessment year 2013-2014 subject to the petitioner depositing 10% of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iled appeal against the order of assessment for the year 2013-2014 before the 2nd respondent. The petitioner moved the 2nd respondent by filing Ext.P3 appeal together with stay petition. The 2nd respondent vide order Ext.P4 granted stay but imposed the condition of depositing 30% of the demand. Apparently, the petitioner has not complied with the condition imposed in Ext.P4. 2. Hav ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ances of this case he contends that no direction could be issued by this Court even for disposing of Ext.P3 appeal. He alternatively submits that the statutory appeal since is an important legal remedy this court can exercise its discretion to put the petitioner to the condition of 20% either for stay or for directing 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal. 3. The learned counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
