9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 1197X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of 2019, which is essentially an application for leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, intends to move the said application. The final orders in the application being CA 92 of 2019, which relates to the jurisdiction of this Court to proceed with the CP 1 of 2016 is not yet passed. C.A. No. 103 of 2019 is adjourned till CA 92 of 2019 is heard and finally disposed of - Let all these ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s. U. Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. I. Basu, Adv., Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Ajoy Sankar Sanyal, Adv., Ms. Shreyasi Sanyal, Adv., Mr. Anupam Dasadhikari, Adv., Mr. Soumya Roy, Adv., Mr. S. Mahato, Adv., Mr. M. Mukherjee, Adv., Ms. Shreeradha Ghosh, Adv., Mr. Yash Vardhan Deora, Adv., Mr. Sourojit Dasgupta, Adv., Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Adv., Mr. B. M. Sharma, Adv., Mr. P. Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sakya Sen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e submits that he is neither asking for stay of the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) nor a direction holding that NCLT does not have the jurisdiction to entertain an application from a creditor of the company under the provision of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). He concludes by submitting that this Court should hold that it has the jurisdiction and competence to proc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... anted to them for filing synopsis of their argument. Mr. Sakya Sen, learned Advocate appearing in support of the application being CA 103 of 2019, which is essentially an application for leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, intends to move the said application. The final orders in the application being CA 92 of 2019, which relates to the jurisdiction of this Court to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
