1995 (11) TMI 73

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... her, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the assessee was engaged in a priority industry and was, therefore, entitled to higher rate of development rebate at 35 per cent. ?" The facts, as succinctly stated, are that the assessee purchased a cotton waste plant during the accounting period corresponding to the assessment year 1970-71. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ms of item No. 32 of the Fifth Schedule to the Act. The Tribunal rejected the contention of the Revenue and affirmed the view taken by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner following its earlier decision in Income-tax Reference No. 1150/(All.) of 1975-76, dated May 18, 1976. Item No. 32 of the Fifth Schedule in the Act is as follows: "Textiles (including those dyed, printed or otherwise process .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X