9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 1379X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... propose to pass an interim order with regard to the release of the goods seized by the officers of the Goods and Services Tax department. It appears from the materials on record that the writ applicant herein is engaged in the business of betel nuts. He is a registered dealer under the Goods and Services Tax Act (for short, 'the GST Act'). The writ-applicant is operating from the State of Tamil Nadu. It appears that the consignment of betel nuts was being transported from Vellor, State of Tamil Nadu, to Delhi. While the goods were in transit and passing through the State of Gujarat, the vehicle was intercepted by the officers of the GST and the same came to be detained on the ground that E-Way Bill was not produced when demande ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... following terms: "1. Mr.Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioners invited the attention of the court to the provisions of sections 129 and 130 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to point out the procedure which is required to be followed by the respondent authorities in case where any goods are in transit in contravention of the provision of the Act or the rules made thereunder. It was pointed out that firstly, under section 129 of the Act, the officer is required to issue a notice as contemplated under sub-section (3) thereof and thereafter, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the person concerned, pass an order thereunder. It was submitted that it is only if there is no compliance of the order passed unde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 9 of the CGST Act provides that the proper officer detaining or seizing the goods or conveyances shall issue a notice specifying the tax and penalty payable and thereafter, pass an order for payment of tax and penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c). Sub-section (4) provides that no tax, interest or penalty shall be determined under sub-section (3) without giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard. 5. In the present case, the show-cause notice dated 01.03.2019 has been issued under section 130 of the CGST Act calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the goods in question as well as the vehicle should not be confiscated for non-payment of an amount of Rs. 60,72,639/-, as detailed therein. On a query ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
