9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (7) TMI 481X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ty involved herein is more than 3.5 Crores. In these circumstances, we find no reason to accept the today s request of adjournment. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. - Excise Misc. Application No.50862 of 2018 in Excise Appeal No. 52120 of 2016 [DB] - Final Order No. 50857/2019 - Dated:- 10-5-2019 - Mr. C.L. Mahar, Member (Technical) and Mrs. Rachna Gupta, Member (Judicial) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ailed to take the appropriate steps to get the appeal disposed of on merits. In fact, opted to not to appear before this Tribunal. As a result thereof, the appeal was dismissed vide final order No.57462/2017 dated 25.10.2017. 2. It is thereafter that the appellant filed a Misc. Application praying for restoration of appeal on 27.02.2018. The appeal was restored vide order No.50240/2018 d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ply, has neither filed any reply nor made any other kind of representation rather had requested continuously for the adjournments for the purpose. The order in original was accordingly passed ex-parte . The similar conduct continued even before this Tribunal, resulting into the final order of 25.10.2017. The order dated 03.05.2018 is an example of liberal consideration on the part of the Tribunal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ounsel for the appellants and submits that the learned counsel for the appellants is not present in the Court today. It is stated that he is out of station. This is no ground to seek adjournment. We therefore reject the request for adjournment. We have asked the learned counsel to argue the matter. He submits that he does not know anything about the case. In these circumstances, we dismi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
