TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1780X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... entative by its Managing Partner vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, representative by Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue(CT-II) Department [2015 (2) TMI 1314 - SUPREME COURT] where it was held that It is an admitted fact that after the disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner, the appellant had deposited the pre-deposit as directed by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s covered by the decision dated 23 rd February, 2015, rendered in M/s. Innovatives Systems, representative by its Managing Partner vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, representative by Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue(CT-II) Department [Civil Appeal No.2230 of 2015]. In view of the aforesaid concession given at the Bar, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the Hig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|